As this stage of Amplified Leicester comes to an end I'm thinking about how best to write about it and explain what happened. I'll give a brief presentation at the 15th April Showcase and there will be plenty more opportunities for me and others to share our thoughts in the future. But it's not easy to explain the Amplified Individual because the qualities involved are quite complex. It would be great to find a simpler way to convey them, and I'm wondering whether it's possible to come up with a set of 10 icons representing the 10 characteristics listed below.
As a reminder, this list was devised by researchers at the Institute for the Future, Palo Alto, but as far as I know ours is the first practical implementation of the theory.
According to the IFTF: As networked amplification becomes the norm, individuals are developing new super-individual skills that enable them to thrive in an increasingly complex and collaborative work culture. These include:
- Mobbability—the ability to work in large groups, and to organize and collaborate with many people simultaneously.
- Influency—knowing how to be persuasive in multiple social contexts and media spaces, and demonstrating awareness that each context and space requires a different persuasive strategy and technique.
- High Ping Quotient—responsiveness to other people’s requests for engagement; propensity to reach out to others in a network.
- Protovation—fearless innovation in rapid, iterative cycles.
- Open Authorship—ease with creating content for immediate public consumption and modification.
- Emergensight—the ability to prepare for and handle surprising results and complexity.
- Multi-capitalism—fluency in working with different capitals (e.g., natural, intellectual, social, financial, virtual).
- Longbroading—thinking in terms of higher-level systems, massively multiple cycles, and the very big picture.
- Signal/Noise Management—filtering meaningful information, patterns, and commonalities from the massively multiple streams of data and advice.
- Cooperation Radar—the ability to sense, almost intuitively, who would make the best collaborators on a particular task.